Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4

-24%
B931.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4
Jan 25, 2028
TL;DR

The Amsterdam Variation builds a big center with 6.f4 and threatens e5 — a less common but principled attacking try that dodges the entire Bg5 theoretical complex. White scores 49.7% across 445k games.

Reviewed by

IM John Bartholomew
IM John BartholomewCo-Founder & Chess Educator

International Master and chess educator. Co-founded Chessable and joined Chessiverse as co-founder. Best known for his "Climbing the Rating Ladder" YouTube series and structured opening courses.

Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: A Complete Guide
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4 - Opening Moves
Summary

Starting from 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4, players enter the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 — ECO B93. Lichess records 445,237 games in this line, which gives us a reliable view of how it actually performs in practice.

History and Notable Players

It arises from the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation. Among the most prolific White practitioners are Andrei Sokolov (51 games), Gyula Sax (41 games), Stefan Kindermann (36 games). Black-side regulars include Lev Polugaevsky (28 games), Lubomir Ftacnik (25 games), Loek Van Wely (22 games).

Performance Across Rating Levels

How well the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 works depends on what level you're playing at. At 1200 Elo, the opening shows up in 0.00% of games (13,315 samples). White scores 47.5%, Black 49%, draws 3.4%. Move up to 1800 Elo and the share shifts to 0.01%, with White winning 48.3% versus Black's 47.3%. At 2500, 0.06% of games go into this opening; draws sit at 7.9% — the line is well-mapped at this level.

Time Control Patterns

Look at the same opening across time controls and blitz stands out. In bullet, it appears in 0.01% of games (164,573); White wins 49.5%. Blitz shows 0.01% adoption across 376,980 games, White scoring 50%. In rapid, the share rises to 0.01% — 68,257 games, White 48.2%.

Move Diversity and Theory Depth

What players actually play after the opening moves depends heavily on rating. At 1200 Elo, the top reply is e5, played 33.1% of the time. There are 6 other moves seeing meaningful share, and 69.9% of games stick to established theory. Entropy: 2.71. By 2500, e5 dominates at 59.5% of replies; only 5 viable alternatives remain and 84.4% of moves are theory. Entropy drops to 1.87. That entropy collapse is the signature of a line where preparation pays off: at the top, players know the best move and play it.

Year-over-year data tells you whether this opening is a contemporary fixture or a fading one. Adoption peaked in 2017 at 0.01% (15,825 games). By 2025 it sits at 0.01% — a 24% shift overall, leaving the line in decline.

Common Mistakes

  • Drifting away from main theory — At 400 Elo, theory adherence sits at 64.9% — versus 76% at 2000. The most popular deviation is Nc6 (played 11.5% of the time at 400, much less so up top). It looks fine but quietly hands the better-prepared side an edge.
  • Neglecting development — It can feel productive to make extra pawn moves early, but falling behind in piece development is what loses most amateur games — especially in open positions where active pieces find squares fast.
  • Ignoring the kingside attack — In sharp Sicilian lines, White typically castles long and pushes the h-pawn. Without your own counterplay on the queenside or in the centre, White's attack lands first.

Practice on Chessiverse

Ready to try the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 against a bot? Pick an opponent at your level and play a game.

Quick Facts

Main Line1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4
DifficultyExpert
Style

Aggressor openings create immediate tension and look for direct attacks. These lines are designed to put pressure on the opponent from the very first moves, often leading to unbalanced positions.

445,237games on Lichess
49.7%
4.7%
45.6%
White wins Draws Black wins

Top Players

As White
As Black

Data from Lichess opening explorer (blitz & rapid)

Most Popular At2500
SharpnessSharp

Popularity by Rating

Percentage of all games at each rating bracket that feature this opening.

Data from Lichess opening explorer (blitz & rapid games)

Theory Adherence by Rating

How often players choose the single most popular move at this position. Higher = more predictable play.

Black to move after the opening line

Popularity Over Time

Share of all Lichess blitz + rapid games featuring this opening, by year.

Top Moves by Rating

Black to move after the opening line

RatingMost Popular2nd3rd
400e535.5%e617.9%Nc611.5%
1000e536%e619.5%Nc610.7%
1200e533.1%e625.6%Nc611.3%
1400e630%e528.6%Nc612%
1600e633.7%e526.4%Nc610.7%
1800e635.8%e527.9%Nc69.3%
2000e634.9%e533.7%Nc67.3%
2200e544.4%e628.9%Qc76.8%
2500e559.5%e618.8%Qc76.2%

Popularity by Time Control

Bullet
<0.01%165K
Blitz
0.01%377K
Rapid
<0.01%68K
2% more decisive in bullet
Raw data tables (Lichess blitz + rapid)
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: popularity and win rates by player rating
Rating (Elo)Share %GamesWhite win %Black win %Draw %Sharpness
4000.0052845.850.93.20.968
10000.003,45046.650.13.30.967
12000.0013,31547.549.03.40.966
14000.0039,00347.848.63.60.964
16000.0180,71647.448.73.90.961
18000.01108,62848.347.34.30.957
20000.02106,79151.543.55.00.950
22000.0584,97752.941.25.90.941
25000.067,82949.043.27.90.921
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: move-choice theory adherence by rating
Rating (Elo)Top moveTop move %Viable movesTheory %Entropy
400e535.5664.92.769
1000e536.0666.22.766
1200e533.1669.92.706
1400e630.0670.72.711
1600e633.7570.92.665
1800e635.8673.02.559
2000e634.9576.02.412
2200e544.4580.12.214
2500e559.5584.41.870
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: popularity over time
YearShare %GamesWhite win %Black win %Draw %
20130.0123146.847.65.6
20140.0177646.347.95.8
20150.012,49150.944.74.4
20160.017,50647.547.94.6
20170.0115,82548.747.04.4
20180.0125,19048.847.04.1
20190.0134,07849.546.34.2
20200.0177,71449.445.65.0
20210.0188,53749.645.64.8
20220.0169,46649.945.54.6
20230.0159,19150.245.14.7
20240.0151,92350.045.44.6
20250.0145,58950.344.94.7
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: popularity by time control
FormatShare %GamesWhite win %Black win %Draw %Sharpness
bullet0.01164,57349.547.23.30.967
blitz0.01376,98050.045.44.60.954
rapid0.0168,25748.246.85.00.950
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: top candidate moves by rating bracket
Rating (Elo)1st move1st %2nd move2nd %3rd move3rd %
400e535.5e617.9Nc611.5
1000e536.0e619.5Nc610.7
1200e533.1e625.6Nc611.3
1400e630.0e528.6Nc612.0
1600e633.7e526.4Nc610.7
1800e635.8e527.9Nc69.3
2000e634.9e533.7Nc67.3
2200e544.4e628.9Qc76.8
2500e559.5e618.8Qc76.2
Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3...... 6.f4: top practitioners by side
SidePlayerGames
WhiteAndrei Sokolov51
WhiteGyula Sax41
WhiteStefan Kindermann36
BlackLev Polugaevsky28
BlackLubomir Ftacnik25
BlackLoek Van Wely22

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4?

The Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 begins with 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4 and is classified under ECO code B93.

Is the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 suitable for beginners?

The Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 involves significant theoretical preparation and sharp tactical play. While beginners can learn the basic ideas, it is more commonly recommended for intermediate and advanced players who are willing to invest time in studying specific lines. For practice, our lower-rated bots offer a forgiving environment to learn the patterns.

What are the win rates for the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4?

In a database of 445,237 master games, White wins 49.7% of the time, Black wins 45.6%, and 4.7% are drawn. Notable players on the White side include Andrei Sokolov and Gyula Sax. On the Black side, Lev Polugaevsky and Lubomir Ftacnik are among the most frequent practitioners.

How can I practice the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4?

On Chessiverse, you can practice the Najdorf Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3... 6.f4 by playing against our 600+ AI bots. Each bot has a unique playing style and opening repertoire, so you can find the perfect sparring partner for any level.

Reviewed by

IM John Bartholomew
IM John BartholomewCo-Founder & Chess Educator

International Master and chess educator. Co-founded Chessable and joined Chessiverse as co-founder. Best known for his "Climbing the Rating Ladder" YouTube series and structured opening courses.

Practice This Opening on Chessiverse

Play against 1000+ AI bots with unique personalities and opening repertoires. From beginner-friendly to grandmaster-level opponents, find the perfect sparring partner for any opening.

Play Now

Not sure which opening fits you? Take the free chess personality test — your style determines which openings will work with you.

Back to Articles